2004 Audi A3 vs. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 960 kg more than 2004 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A3 | 1958 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A3 | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3300 mm |
