2004 Audi A3 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 705 kg more than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A3 | 62 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1894 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 79 L |