2004 Audi A3 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2004 Audi A3.
Because 2004 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A3 | 62 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 6389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 79 L |