2004 Audi A3 vs. 1962 Seat 600

To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: