2004 Audi A3 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 680 kg more than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A3 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 79 L |
