2004 Audi A3 vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 1109 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus 25 has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | A3 | 25 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 9500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 456 kg |