2004 Audi A3 vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 85 kg more than 2004 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A3 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |