2004 Audi A3 vs. 1967 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1967 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1967 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1967 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A3 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2390 mm |