2004 Audi A3 vs. 1968 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1968 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1968 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1968 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1968 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Audi | NSU |
Model | A3 | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 37 L |