2004 Audi A3 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne

To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.

Because 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Audi A3 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model A3 Biscayne
Year Released 2004 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1968 cc 4097 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 110 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 251 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 1600 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 5590 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 3090 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 87 L