2004 Audi A3 vs. 1973 Holden UTE
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1973 Holden UTE. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1973 Holden UTE.
Because 2004 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1973 Holden UTE | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A3 | UTE |
Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 5047 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 77.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |