2004 Audi A3 vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1982 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A3 | 929 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |