2004 Audi A3 vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A3 | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2640 mm |