2004 Audi A3 vs. 1984 Toyota Cressida

To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 2,759 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1984 Toyota Cressida.

Because 1984 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Audi A3 1984 Toyota Cressida
Make Audi Toyota
Model A3 Cressida
Year Released 2004 1984
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1968 cc 2759 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 0 HP
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.5 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 8.8:1
Top Speed 207 km/hour 179 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 9.5 seconds 12.3 seconds
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1390 kg 1105 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 75 L