2004 Audi A3 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Because 2004 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A3 | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | A3 | RX-Evolv |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
