2004 Audi A3 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 185 kg more than 2004 Audi A3.
Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A3 (320 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A3 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | A3 | Zo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 83 L |
