2004 Audi A3 vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki C2. (251 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 713 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A3 | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | A3 | C2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 852 kg |
