2004 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 749 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (148 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A3 | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | A3 | Extreme |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 241 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2420 mm |
