2004 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Marcos Mantis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Marcos Mantis would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 309 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (230 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
Make | Audi | Marcos |
Model | A3 | Mantis |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 506 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 613 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
Top Speed | 236 km/hour | 283 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2290 mm |