2004 Audi A3 vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 101 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Omega weights approximately 93 kg more than 2004 Audi A3.
Because 2001 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (447 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (148 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 2001 Opel Omega | |
Make | Audi | Opel |
Model | A3 | Omega |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 447 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 99.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 91.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |