2004 Audi A3 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 235 kg more than 2004 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (320 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A3 | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | A3 | XJ |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3040 mm |
