2004 Audi A3 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 265 kg more than 2004 Audi A3.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A3 (148 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A3 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | A3 | F1 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 45 L |
