2004 Audi A3 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A3 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A3. (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A3 | Raider |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.5 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.7 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 83 L |