2004 Audi A3 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A3 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A3 (330 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A3 | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |