2004 Audi A3 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A3 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (247 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2004 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | A3 | Challenger |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.9 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |