2004 Audi A3 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A3 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C70. (224 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C70.
Because 2004 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70. 2004 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 2009 Volvo C70 has manual transmission. 2009 Volvo C70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | A3 | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 239 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |