2004 Audi A4 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Audi A4 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2004 Audi A4. (187 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 335 kg more than 2004 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A4 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | A4 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 40 L |
