2004 Audi A4 vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 2004 Audi A4 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A4 (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A4 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A4 (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A4 | 1962 Mini MK I | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | A4 | MK I |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2040 mm |