2004 Audi A4 vs. 1964 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Audi A4 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2004 Audi A4. (170 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A4 weights approximately 950 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Because 1964 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A4. (235 Nm). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A4 | 1964 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A4 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1784 cc | 2890 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 20.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 700 kg |