2004 Audi A4 vs. 1967 Holden HR
To start off, 2004 Audi A4 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A4 (220 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A4 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1967 Holden HR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Holden HR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A4 (310 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A4 | 1967 Holden HR | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | A4 | HR |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2976 cc | 3048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
