2004 Audi A4 vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 2004 Audi A4 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2004 Audi A4. (220 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A4 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.
Because 2004 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (626 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A4. (310 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A4 | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | A4 | Park Lane |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 6990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 626 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3130 mm |