2004 Audi A4 vs. 1982 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 2004 Audi A4 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A4 (170 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A4 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Audi A4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A4 (235 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A4 | 1982 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Audi | Daihatsu |
Model | A4 | Taft |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1784 cc | 2764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 165 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2030 mm |