2004 Audi A4 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2004 Audi A4 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Audi A4. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A4 (225 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2004 Audi A4 has manual transmission. 2004 Audi A4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A4 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A4 | FTO |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |