2004 Audi A4 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 2004 Audi A4 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2004 Audi A4. (170 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A4 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A4 (235 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A4 | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A4 | RX-Evolv |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1784 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 214 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |