2004 Audi A4 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A4 would be higher. At 2,981 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A4 weights approximately 284 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A4 (300 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A4 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A4 | Condor |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2981 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |