2004 Audi A4 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2004 Audi A4. (137 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 445 kg more than 2004 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A4. (310 Nm @ 1740 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A4 | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A4 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1740 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1927 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.7 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |