2004 Audi A6 vs. 1942 Jeep MB
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 4,179 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (300 HP) has 241 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 745 kg more than 1942 Jeep MB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (401 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1942 Jeep MB. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1942 Jeep MB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1942 Jeep MB | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | A6 | MB |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4179 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2040 mm |
