2004 Audi A6 vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 1112 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Audi | Maserati |
| Model | A6 | A6G |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 550 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2290 mm |
