2004 Audi A6 vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 12 kg more than 1952 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Audi | Talbot |
| Model | A6 | Baby |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3130 mm |
