2004 Audi A6 vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | A6 | Seven |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 29 L |