2004 Audi A6 vs. 1962 Austin A 90
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 92 kg more than 1962 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 90. (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1962 Austin A 90 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | A6 | A 90 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 83.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 34 L |