2004 Audi A6 vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2540 mm |