2004 Audi A6 vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (265 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 865 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | A6 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2540 mm |
