2004 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (300 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 265 kg more than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A6 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4179 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 79 L |
