2004 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (220 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | Cortina |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 90 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 58.1 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |