2004 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,179 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (300 HP) has 236 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 691 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (401 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | A6 | EJ |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4179 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |
