2004 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 1206 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | A6 | 25 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 196 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 456 kg |
