2004 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (248 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Audi | Triumph |
Model | A6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |