2004 Audi A6 vs. 1964 Mini MK I
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1964 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 1142 kg more than 1964 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1964 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Audi | Mini |
| Model | A6 | MK I |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 618 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2040 mm |
