2004 Audi A6 vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 1062 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | A6 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 33 L |
